Jonathan Chait on Scott Walker surviving the Wisconsin recall vote:

The Obama-Romney exit poll finding is probably the most surprising data point to emerge from the mess in Wisconsin. Obama has maintained strong support among minorities, and fairly strong support among college-educated white voters, but his standing with white voters lacking a college degree has fallen even below its low 2008 levels. If there’s any region where Romney ought to be making inroads, it’s upper Midwest states, where Obama still relies on blue-collar voters. Michigan and, to a lesser degree, Ohio ought to be exceptions, owing to the special circumstances of the auto bailout. Wisconsin and Iowa are ground zero for states likely to fall to Romney. Tonight’s exit polls suggest he’s much farther away than many of us believed.

But Walker’s win will certainly provide a blueprint for fellow Republicans. When they gain a majority, they can quickly move to not just wrest concessions from public sector unions but completely destroy them, which in turn eliminates one of the strongest sources of political organization for the Democratic Party. And whatever backlash develops, it’s probably not enough to outweigh the political benefit. Walker has pioneered a tactic that will likely become a staple of Republican governance. Fortune favors the bold.

Save Us, Ben Bernanke, You're Our Only Hope by Matthew O'Brien

The US economy and jobs: the basic arithmetic by Dean Baker

The discussions of the economy have lost sight of the basic score. The US economy is operating at close to 6% below its potential with employment down by almost 10 million compared with its trend level. This is an incredible waste of resources. It is also devastating to the unemployed workers and their families.
...
President Obama and the Democratic leadership have refused to put forward a serious alternative path. While they have been willing to argue that rich people should have to pay some taxes, they have not come to grips with the nature of this downturn, as if hoping that, somehow, the economy will just jump back to its pre-recession level of output through some magical process. There is no magic that will allow the economy to override basic arithmetic. In the short term, only the government can provide the boost necessary to support the economy. Over the longer term, we will need to get the trade deficit down through a more competitive dollar.

(via Mark Thoma)

Wisconsin Recall Vote

David Brooks (Bobo) on debt

Dean Baker responds

Turning Our Backs on Unions by Joe Nocera

Noah includes himself as one of those liberals “who spent too much time beating up unions,” as he told me recently. (He and I are both members of the informal Washington Monthly alumni society.) His thinking began to change in the early 1990s when he read “Which Side Are You On?” It is a powerful meditation on the difficulties unions face, written by Thomas Geoghegan, a Chicago labor lawyer. Researching “The Great Divergence” reinforced Noah’s growing view that when liberals turned their backs on unions — when they put, in his words, “identity politics over economic justice” — they made a terrible mistake.

Republicans outspent Democrats on the Wisconsin recall vote 7 to 1.

What Constrains the Federal Reserve? An Interview with Joseph Gagnon by Mike Konczal

Game of Thrones Week 10: Destiny and Other Foolish Notions by Charlie Jane Anders

"Valar Morghulis" Onion review (for newbies)

"Valar Morghulis" Onion review (for experts)

Catastrophic Credibility by Krugman

Student debt up, all other kinds down by Doug Henwood

Obama may lose.

I'm betting Obama will lose now and Bernanke will have an awful legacy.

The Lousy Jobs Number & Obama's Original Sin by Noam Scheiber

Which, in the end, brings us back to the original sin of the Obama administration. As I report in my recent book on Obama and the economy, the administration’s top economists knew the amount of stimulus they were proposing was much too small to solve the unemployment problem within a few years. One reason they felt okay about this relates to a concept called “escape velocity,” which held that you didn’t need the full amount of stimulus your math suggested (something approaching $2 trillion). If you just provided an initial boost, the economy could take care of the rest on its own: Consumers would start spending, which would raise GDP, lower unemployment, and lead to further spending. And the whole process would accelerate as people gained confidence, leading to a self-sustaining recovery.

It was, in effect, a bet that you could get away with spending much less than necessary by manipulating mass psychology. And for a while it worked: The economy grew pretty rapidly in late 2009 and early 2010. But, as several administration economists have subsequently conceded to me, we never quite hit escape velocity, which is why we’ve been in stall speed more or less ever since.

A central-bank failure of epic proportions by Ryan Avent

The Austerity Agenda by Krugman

The answer is that an economy is not like an indebted family. Our debt is mostly money we owe to each other; even more important, our income mostly comes from selling things to each other. Your spending is my income, and my spending is your income.

So what happens if everyone simultaneously slashes spending in an attempt to pay down debt? The answer is that everyone’s income falls — my income falls because you’re spending less, and your income falls because I’m spending less. And, as our incomes plunge, our debt problem gets worse, not better.

This isn’t a new insight. The great American economist Irving Fisher explained it all the way back in 1933, summarizing what he called “debt deflation” with the pithy slogan “the more the debtors pay, the more they owe.” Recent events, above all the austerity death spiral in Europe, have dramatically illustrated the truth of Fisher’s insight.

And there’s a clear moral to this story: When the private sector is frantically trying to pay down debt, the public sector should do the opposite, spending when the private sector can’t or won’t. By all means, let’s balance our budget once the economy has recovered — but not now. The boom, not the slump, is the right time for austerity.

Really depressing stuff. Then I saw the movie Bernie and it cheered me up. If you like Jack Black, Richard Linklater and the South then you'll love this movie.

Game of Thrones Week 9: Bloody Hell! by Charlie Jane Anders

"Blackwater" (for experts) Onion recap

“Blackwater” (for newbies) Onion recap



                                                          

John Waters hitchhikes across America

Fiscal cliffs, multipliers, and the myth of central bank independence by Ryan Avent

Doug Henwood's talk in memory of Bob Fitch

Alexander Cockburn once said the mission of the bourgeois pundit is “to fire volley after volley of cliché into the densely packed prejudices of his readers.”

Cockburn's niece is House and Tron actress Olivia Wilde. His father was Claude Cockburn, a leader of the British Communists.

I've met Cockburn and the actor Iain Glenn who plays Jorah Mormont on Game of Thrones (and was on Downton Abby) reminds me of him with his accent, looks and confidence/bearing. Cockburn is more cheeky with an understated, mischievous smile.

Why Two Percent Inflation Targeting is the New Gold Standard by Yglesias

Game of Thrones Week 8: Siege Mentality by Charlie Jane Anders

Game of Thrones

"The Prince of Winterfell" (for newbies) Onion recap

"The Prince of Winterfell" (for experts) Onion recap

Lots of great scenes. I liked the one with Stannis and Davos. Also Tyrion with Bronn and Varys.

Game of Thrones Week 7: The More People You Love, the Weaker You Are by Charlie Jane Anders

How National Belt-Tightening Goes Awry by Robert J. Shiller

Keynes 1921 and the Euro Crisis by Krugman

Employment laggard: the public sector by Doug Henwood

The central banker's bogeyman by Ryan Avent

Then yesterday, Mr Altig (blogger at Atlanta Fed) addressed an argument made by economist Simon Wren-Lewis:

In another recent blog item (also with a pointer from Mark Thoma), Simon Wren-Lewis offers the opinion that acknowledging uncertainty about size of the output gap actually argues in favor of being "less cautious" about taking an aggressive policy course. The basic idea is familiar. It is a simple matter to raise rates should the Fed overestimate the magnitude of the output gap. But with the short-term policy rates already at zero, it is not so easy to go in the opposite direction should we underestimate the gap.

...
All of recent history, in other words, suggests that Mr Wren-Lewis is exactly right: it's much easier for central banks to go in one direction than in the other. Now one could, as Mr Altig says, come up with a "plausible argument" in which things don't work like that. Given the very large and ongoing costs of labour-market weakness, I would certainly expect America's central bankers to do better than that. I would like to see some very clear evidence that a year or two of 4% inflation poses more of a threat than at least a year or two more of unemployment well above the natural rate. What we're getting instead is little more than hand-waving.

A Man Without Honor (for newbies) Onion recap

A Man Without Honor (for experts) Onion recap

Good comment sections for both.

The Human Disaster of Unemployment by Dean Baker and Kevin Hassett

Thankfully, there is some effort to learn from this model. The recent bill that extended the payroll tax cut included a provision that covered the cost of work-sharing programs in the 23 states that already had them as part of their unemployment insurance systems, and it helped other states start such programs. This should slow job destruction in those states, which will improve chances for all workers seeking employment. From now on, the first line of defense during a recession should be to expand work sharing rather than simply extend unemployment benefits.

Joe Weisenthal vs. the 24-Hour News Cycle by Binyamin Appelbaum

Unemployment Rate Without Government Cuts: 7.1% by Justin Lahart

The Labor Department’s establishment survey of employers — the jobs count that it bases its payroll figures on — shows that the government has been steadily shedding workers since the crisis struck, with 586,000 fewer jobs than in December 2008. Friday’s employment report showed the cuts continued in April, with 15,000 government jobs lost.

But the survey of households that the unemployment rate is based on suggests the government job cuts have been much, much worse.
In April the household survey showed that that there were 442,000 fewer people working in government than in March. The household survey has a much smaller sample size than the establishment survey, and so is prone to volatility, but the magnitude of the drop is striking: It marks the largest decline on both an absolute and a percentage basis on record going back to 1948.

Moreover, the household survey has consistently showed bigger drops in government employment than the establishment survey has.
The unemployment rate would be far lower if it hadn’t been for those cuts: If there were as many people working in government as there were in December 2008, the unemployment rate in April would have been 7.1%, not 8.1%.

Ceteris is rarely paribus, of course: If there were more government jobs now, for example, it’s likely that not as many people would have left the labor force, and so the actual unemployment rate would be north of 7.1%.

It's regressive tax on the middle and lower classes as bargaining power is reduced because of a weak labor market. Cyclical unemployment is transformed into long-term unemployment as the nation's human capital and productive capacity is degraded. It's effective class warfare in the wake of a financial crisis caused by the finanical-system-casino being left to its own devices sans regulation.

Dean Baker reduces uncertainty

Spanish Debt, the European Central Bank, and the Maginot Line by Dean Baker

Problems arise due to the distribution of the debt. If every third household borrowed $600,000, which was lent by the other two households, then this third household is getting deep in debt, with the other two are appearing to build up large amounts of assets.

This is what happened to Spain, the United States and other countries with serious housing bubbles. The other two households were willing to lend money to the third household because they thought it held an asset (a house) of great value. When this turned out not to be true, the third household found itself with an unsustainable debt burden and the other two households found themselves with assets of questionable value. If the third household can't repay its debt, then the loans are no longer worth their face value.

Central banks should be paying attention to the buildup of such unsustainable debt burdens. Unfortunately, the European Central Bank (ECB) was focused on building up its Maginot Line, being vigilant in its fight against inflation.

The problem now is to try to correct the imbalances created by growth of the housing bubble. Spain and the rest of Europe is getting little help from ECB which is still focused on reinforcing the Maginot Line rather than promoting growth in the euro zone.

The problem I have with the MMT/Monetary Mystics is that they believe all debt its bad.

Econoblog commenters like Troy at DeLong's blog, Dan Kervick, noncents, etc.

Question:

Which actor has appeared or is appearing on two of the best television shows ever?

Answer:

Aiden Gillen who plays Littlefinger on Game of Thones and played Councilman Carcetti on The Wire.

I am liking the Hound especially after this past episode. He cut his way through those rioting peasants pretty easily to save Sansa. "Put the bird back in her cage."

As someone said it's not that he doesn't like Tyrion Lannister in particular, he hates everybody.

R.I.P. Adam Yauch of the Beastie Boys (1964-2012) by Nathan Rabin

Was Paul’s Boutique Illegal? How dumb court decisions and bad laws have made it all but impossible for musicians to sample the way the Beastie Boys used to. by Yglesias

Another excerpt from Krugman's End This Depression Now

Game of Thrones Week 6: You can’t control wild creatures, and you can’t own people by Charlie Jane Anders

David Vitter Is Trying To Crush the Economy by Yglesias

Those Revolting Europeans by Krugman

A glimmer of hope. And of course the NYTimes runs a piece in the business section that is complete wrong. It couldn't be more wrong if had been written by that Triumvirate of Dumb - Amity Schlaes, John Cochrane, and Casey Mulligan.


Markets to Give France A Grace Period, Analysts Say by Liz Alderman

Also:

Robert Samuleson Gets Serious About Inflation by Dean Baker

Game of Thrones

The Old Gods and The New (for experts) Onion recap

The Old Gods and The New (for newbies) Onion recap

Official and unofficial Game of Thrones cookbooks. The eels at the King's Landing market last episode made me think of Game of Thrones cuisine.

Ex-president bling bling by Krugman

For as I emphasized in that post earlier today, that German success story was based on a (modestly) inflationary boom in much of the rest of Europe. Give the peripheral countries a comparably favorable external environment — or actually a more favorable one, since they’re much deeper in the hole — and maybe there is a way to make this work. Let Spain regain competitiveness by inflating more slowly than Germany, rather than by deflating, and this whole thing might, might, become feasible.

But this means, yes, overall inflation in the euro area significantly higher than the less than 2 % target. It certainly means a lot higher than the 1.5% the market currently expects.

Don’t like that? OK, so no euro. It’s that stark.

Greta Gerwig has a new movie.

He was struck by her combination of “über-intellectual” and “every-girl connectivity,” he said, “which I find is very rare.”

“She intellectually understands what a lot of her problems are, as her characters, and yet is still incapable of overcoming those problems, which is something we all share and understand,” he said, “and she embodies that very naturally.”         ...

But Ms. Gerwig’s real style is not overtly sexy; she was carrying a backpack and wearing penny loafers, her favorite shoes, with the pennies. (She has three pairs: red, black and “businesswoman brown.”) She has been quietly dating Mr. Baumbach since September and likes NPR and reading the personals in The New York Review of Books.         

Chris Hughes, a Renly for our times as in an admirable gay leader who is interested in public service. The article says he follows Olivia Wilde on Twitter. She was(is?) in the popular show House, played the hottie in Tron: Legacy and Alexander Cockburn is her uncle. From the piece:

The evening was his debut in New York’s clubby literary society. Robert Silvers, the longtime editor of The New York Review of Books being honored that night, offered Mr. Hughes a warm hello. Ken Auletta, an author and New Yorker writer, nodded approvingly as he passed Mr. Hughes on the way out.

Krugman's new book excerpted in the New York Review of Books.

Adam Yauch, 1964-2012

Game of Thrones Week 5: What wins wars: magic, money or manpower? by Charlie Jane Anders

"The Ghost of Harrenhal" (for newbies) Onion recap

"The Ghost of Harrenhal" (for experts) Onion recap

That was fast.

Austan Goolsbee's blog

Where the Productivity Went by Krugman

The Secret of Our Non Success by Krugman

The corporate media really is in large part corrupt. Mostly it's the he said/she said non-partisan convention. We don't want to offend anyone, since we have ads to sell.

Zach Galifianakis will have his show Between Two Ferns on Comedy Central May 6th. He'll interview Tina Fey(!), Jon Stewart and Richard Branson.

Here There Be Spoilers!

In the fourth book of George R.R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire saga, A Feast for Crows, Jaime's aunt Gemma tells him that she once told Tywin, his father and her brother, that Tyrion was Tywin's son. Tywin didn't speak to her for 6 months after that. Last week's show set up that symmetry nicely with Tyrion saving Sansa and Tywin saving Arya.

Looking forward, they should cast Toby Kebbel as Oberyn Martell. He played Johnny Quid in RocknRolla and had a few great scenes, like this one. Here's some more. And another compilation. He was also in Control, Prince of Persia, Wrath of the Titans and War Horse.

"Dornish law does not apply." Tyrion had been so ensnared in his own troubles that he'd never stopped to consider the succession. "My father will crown Tommen, count on that."

"He may indeed crown Tommen, here in King's Landing. Which is not to say that my brother may not crown Myrcella, down in Sunspear. Will your father make war on your niece on behalf of your nephew? Will your sister?" [Oberyn] gave a shrug. "Perhaps I should marry Queen Cersei after all, on the condition that she support her daughter over her son. Do you think she would?"

Never, Tyrion wanted to say, but the word caught in his throat.... "I don't know how my sister would choose, between Tommen and Myrcella," he admitted. "It makes no matter. My father will never give her that choice."

"Your father," said Prince Oberyn, "may not live forever."

Something about the way he said it made the hairs on the back of Tyrion's neck bristle. Suddenly he was mindful of Elia again, and all that Oberyn had said as they crossed the field of ash. He wants the head that spoke the words, not just the hand that swung the sword. "It is not wise to speak such treasons in the Red Keep, my prince. The little birds are listening."

"Let them. Is it treason to say a man is mortal? Valar morghulis was how they said it in Valyria of old. All men must die. And the Doom came and proved it true."

        George R.R. Martin -- A Storm of Swords

FED FAIL!

Bernanke Responds by Krugman

Federal Reserve Board Credibility, Plus 50 Cents, Will Get You a Cup of Coffee by Dean Baker

If this policy was successful, it would lead to lower real interest rates, which would in turn lead to more consumption and investment. Ideally we would also see a decline in th real value of the dollar, leading to more net exports, the essential long-term path to full employment.

My view is that this path would likely be successful, if the Fed were really committed to it. That means continually buying up vast amounts of assets if the inflation rate did not appear to be rising. This should ultimately freak enough investor types into thinking that Bernanke was sufficiently nuts that he could cause inflation. They would then hedge themselves against this risk by buying up all sorts of commodities to protect against inflation, which would then lead to inflation.

Did Ben Bernanke Just Say That the Fed Made a Mistake by Allowing Inflation to Get Above 2% During the Great Depression? by DeLong

Fed Policy Remains on Hold by Mark Thoma

And this has been another edition of FED FAIL in the 21st Century.

The Strike and Its Enemies by Seth Ackerman

Fantasy, Modernism, and Capitalism

Tyrion: If I told you to murder, say, an infant girl still at her mother's breast. Would you do it, without question?

Bronn: Without question? No. I'd ask how much.

One of the things that first made the fantasy genre popular was that it became a new way for literature to battle back against modernism. It was a genre filled with good guys and bad guys, with the kinds of larger-than-life stories that were once the provenance of mythology and national epics. Game Of Thrones works best when it suggests the good guys aren’t all that good and the bad guys aren’t all that bad, then asks just what all of them are going to do about the truly awful elements in their midst, like the White Walkers, or King Joffrey, or the torture of smallfolk.

The second quote is from Todd VanDerWerff's Onion recap (for experts) of season 2/episode 4 "Garden of Bones."

What's attractive about the fantasy genre for me is that modernism entails capitalism and the cash nexus. The cash nexus dissolves bonds of social solidarity and value until you are left with nothing but price and cost. After the Cold War, welfare capitalism has given way to "greed is good" capitalism.  There is no (or not much) honor, chivalry, loyalty, integrity, or virtue which were once the the redeeming aspects of capitalism's predecessor Feudalism. (Although obviously not everyone was honorable back especially given material circumstances.) Also late capitalism entails consumerism, and wall-to-wall advertising (flashing billboards, telemarketers calling during dinner, spam and pop-up ads), environmental disaster, urban blight, and an economy dominated by the financial sector and speculation/gambling. The Fantasy genre is a respite from all of that. Perhaps it's escapist to harken back to a lost age, but the fantasy genre does hold up the good virtues even if like in Game of Thrones, it's a brutal time of war.

Capitalism is undeniably a giant progress in a number of areas. Feminism and notions of human rights arrived in late-capitalism and welfare capitalism had less of a stratified, class structure. One of the undeniable reactionary aspects of Feudalism is its authoritarian appeal to a rigid social structure where everyone knows their place. Also obviously capitalism has less starvation during winter. Westeros is chock full of prostitution and the suffering small people. Esteros is full of slaves and brutality. What is compelling about Game of Thrones is that it explores the dark side of Feudalism in a realistic manner and doesn't romanticize it.

But some of the admirable Feudal values have been lost to an extent. There is just the cash nexus. And it seems to be corrupting the political/public sphere in a corrosive feedback loop. Witness the housing bubble and economic crises and the Republican Party being taken over by frauds and fanatics. Free-market welfare capitalism has morphed into rent-seeking crony capitalism and socialism for the rich where slow growth, low inflation and high unemployment is a regressive tax on wages. Inequality increases as past progress is lost.

Ned Stark exemplified the redeeming values of Feudalism for me and hence the attraction of fantasy fiction.* For one even though he was the ruler in the north and a noble he was accountable to his  people. He performed his own executions and did his own dirty work so that power wouldn't corrupt him. (Or maybe it was more of a symbol of accountable rulership.) And Maester Luwin told Bran that a good lord needs to listen to his subjects. Ned Stark also expressed some sympathy for the low born butcher's boy to Varys last season, after Varys mentioned the unpleasantness on the Kingsroad. And he was against assassinating Daenyres Targaryen.

Ned Stark also had honor and integrity, which meant telling the truth. If he hadn't, Stannis and Renly wouldn't be challenging King Joffrey's claim to the throne. And the North wouldn't have rebelled. If he wasn't loyal to his friend he would have remained in the North and no doubt the Lannisters would have taken over.

As Robb tells Talisa, if there had not been a war, the realm would be subject to Joffrey's cruel and capricious rule. Maybe that would be better war. But the reign of Joffrey Baratheon could be a disaster also. He probably would have sparked a rebellion sooner or later just as the King Aerys did as he descended into madness.

And in the background you have the Red Comet, the return of magic, The Others, The Lord of Light, and Daenerys's dragons.

-----------------------------------
* Was humanity hard-wired with morales and social solidarity? In Feudalism you had chivalry, loyalty and codes of honor. In welfare capitalism you had progress on a number of fronts of well being.

What I like about Game of Thrones is that there is a wide spectrum and variety of evil. Tywin Lannister may be bad, but he's more reasonable than his mad dog, the Mountain That Rides and The Tickler and Polliver. Tyrion is good but maneuvers within the system in the belly of the beast. On the good side I'd list the Nightswatch, Davos Seaworth, Brienne, Daenyres, Robb, Jorah Mormont, Brienne, Maester Luwin. Arya, and even Sansa saved Ser Dantos. Varys, Stannis and Renly are little complicated. Same with the Tyrells.

On the bad side, Arya's hit list (Joffrey, Cersei, Ilyn Payne, the Hound, Polliver, the Mountain) and Littlefinger, Pycelle, Craster, Walder Frey, Balon Greyjoy, Theon, Roose Bolton, the Tickler, Jaime, Ser Meryn Trant). Although I kind of like the Hound - "I ain't no ser" just as Brienne says "I'm no Lady" but he serves the wrong crowd.

Again I am taken back to the exchange between Roose Bolton and Rob Stark. When Robb objects to Roose employing torture, he replies that "the high road is pretty, but you can't march your army down it" and Robb replies that he doesn't want to give the Lannisters an excuse to hurt his sisters. Maybe that reasoning is partly why morality and codes of honor were developed in human societies.

Call for Growth to Counter German Push for Austerity by Nicholas Kulish

In the Netherlands, Prime Minister Mark Rutte handed his resignation to Queen Beatrix on Monday after his government failed to pass new austerity measures over the weekend.

Chairman Bernanke Should Listen to Professor Bernanke by Krugman

I suspect that the old Bernanke would have scoffed. He would have pointed out that the Fed could still keep inflation within bounds — that 4 percent inflation (which is what we actually had during the late years of the Reagan administration) need be no more unsettling than 2 percent inflation. He would also, I suspect, have argued that the risks of losing credibility pale beside the risks of inaction. Bear in mind, whenever someone invokes the specter of a return to ’70s-style stagflation, when the economy is weak and inflation is high — a greatly overrated risk — that what we are going through now is much, much worse than anything that happened in the ’70s. It takes a certain mind-set to worry more about a hypothetical loss of confidence than about the clear and present suffering of the unemployed — the mind-set, one might say, of a conventional central banker. 

As the Second Phase of Europe's Second Great Depression Rolls Forward... by DeLong

Big election in France on May 6th as the Socialist candidate could win the runoff according to polls. He has expressed skepticism over the EU's austerity policies.

Also an election in the Netherlands has been called.

The Roose Is Loose!

Robb takes a liking to the Volantene Florence Nightingale named Talisa.

We met the Tickler and Roose Bolton whose sigil is the Flayed Man. We met Xaro Xhoan Daxos, one of the 13 of Qarth, (the actor played Tank as in think tank in RocknRolla.). We got a look at Qarth and Harrenhal, which didn't move in the opening credits.

Game of Thrones Week 4: True greatness means letting others do your dirty work by Charlie Jane Anders

At the top of the hour, Lord Roose Bolton cautions Robb Stark that he can't march his army down the high road. And the episode ends with a similar homily: King Stannis tells his most faithful servant, Ser Davos Seaworth the Onion Knight, that "cleaner ways don't win wars."

Tyrion to Meryn Trant: "I'm not threatening the King. I'm educating my nephew. Bronn, the next time Ser Meryn speaks, kill him. (pregnant pause) That was a threat. See the difference?"

Bronn to Tyrion: "There's no cure for being a cunt."

Tyrion to himself: "Lady Stark, you may survive us yet."

Peter Jackson poached season one's Mountain for the Hobbit.

"Garden of Bones" Onion recap (for experts)

(plus good comments)


"Garden of Bones" Onion recap (for newbies)

(more good comments)

Distributional Impacts of Monetary Policy by Tim Duy

This past episode (21) of New Girl titled "Kids" had Zooey Deschanel mentioning Bridge to Terabithia* and for some reason she reminded me of the lovely actress Debra Winger with her kind blue eyes, raspy voice, and mischievious smile. (Maybe Winger could play her mother. Or Deschanel could make a remake of Legal Eagles.)

I recently saw 21 Jump Street which was created in part by DeLong's cousin Phil Lord. Jake Johnson from New Girl was in it, as was Nick Offerman. It was pretty funny. Offerman also had a bit part in the very funny Will Ferrell movie Casa di mi Padre.



For some reason Blogger force me to redesign the blog. The links on the right are messed-up and will be fixed.

----------------
* Deschanel's character Jess said it was movie that made children cry. As an adult I thought it was pretty sad. Deschanel had a supporting role playing a teacher, just as Jess is a teacher.

Remembering Christopher Hitchens by David Remnick

The speaker that struck me most deeply was the first: James Fenton. A superior poet, and perhaps the greatest reader of poetry in the English-speaking world, Fenton opened the program by reciting verse of his own:

What would the dead want from us
Watching from their cave?
Would they have us forever howling?
Would they have us rave
Or disfigure ourselves, or be strangled
Like some ancient emperor’s slave?

None of my dead friends were emperors
With such exorbitant tastes
And none of them were so vengeful
As to have all their friends waste
Waste quite away in sorrow
Disfigured and defaced.

I think the dead would want us
To weep for what they have lost.
I think that our luck in continuing
Is what would affect them most.
But time would find them generous
And less self-engrossed.

And time would find them generous
As they used to be
And what else would they want from us
Than an honoured place in our memory,
favourite room, a hallowed chair,
Privilege and celebrity?

And so the dead might cease to grieve
And we might make amends
And there might be a pact between
Dead friends and living friends.
What our dead friends would want from us
Would be such living friends.

Birthday anniversary discussion on Charlie Rose show with Rose, James Fenton, Salman Rushie, Ian, McEwan, and Martin Amis.

Know Thy Enemy

Really, Mr. Chait, Really? by Greg Mankiw
On July 1st, Mankiw who advises Romney and was CEA Chair for George W. Bush, will be rewarded for his schoozing on behalf of the one percent* and will become chairman of the Harvard econ department.

The upside is that he'll be blogging less. For example just the other day he posted a Dilbert cartoon strip. I've always hated Dilbert with a burning passion. When ever someone likes Dilbert, it's a bad sign.

-------------
* For instance in the famous 2008 Summers econ memo to Obama, Mankiw denied to say that any stimulus was needed. And this is who Harvard choses to head their econ department?

Inflationistas*

Is Inflation a Highly Regressive tax on wages? by Dean Baker

Much Ado About Zero (Wonkish) by Krugman

In Wicksellian Terms, It Is Easier for a Central Bank to Alter the Nominal Market Rate of Interest than for It to Alter the Nominal Natural Rate of Interest: Why the Zero Lower Bound Matters by DeLong

As I see it, having high unemployment is a regressive tax on the "middle class." Government policies are structuring the market so that we have slow growth and high unemployment. Wages don't rise with productivity. Inequality rises though.

That last time wages rose with productivity was in the late '90s, something candidate Obama pointed out to BusinessWeek and the Wall Street Journal.

When the economy isn't running at capacity, the government is engineering a regressive tax on wages.

-----------
*Inflationistas want low inflation and slow growth

 
R'hllor, The Lord of Light

The night is dark and full of terrors,
but the fire burns them all away

The Drowned God

What's dead may never die,
but rises again harder and stronger

Simpsons tribute to the Game of Thrones opening credits at :23.

The NYT Doesn't Like Argentina's Decision to Nationalize Repsol by Dean Baker

Occupy the Peter G. Peterson Institute! by Ezra Klein

On Game of Thrones, everyone’s a king, and children are pawns by Charlie Jane Anders (episode 3 recap)

Alas poor Yoren! I knew him well.
(or the dragons are gone....)

"What's Dead May Never Die" Onion recap (for experts)

Good comments.


"What's Dead May Never Die" Onion recap (for newbies)

More good comments.

Greg Mankiw hides the role of government in redistributing income upwards by Dean Baker

This is no doubt how Mitt Romney and other wealthy people would like the public to see the debate. However the reality is that the government has implemented a wide range of policies that have led to a massive upward redistribution of before tax income over the last three decades. These policies have affected every corner of the market economy.

I heard comedian Judah Friedlander talking on the radio about the entertainment industry and he made a very good point about those who succeed are usually good schmoozers. The context was he said that it's part of the reason why comedy films are bad these days in that people who rise to the top are often good schmoozers but not good film-makers, actors etc. He then said it's true in every industry and line of work and I agree. They are smart about schmoozing and work hard at schmoozing and then once installed have sort of an inefficent crony capitalism.

I watched Parks and Recreation but didn't watch the first run of 30 Rock because I had a crush on Tina Fey during her "Weekend Update" and Sarah Palin impersonation years and it's very, very weird and wrong to have a crush on a TV personality. So you shouldn't encourage it. Friedlaner is on 30 Rock and lately I've been watching the reruns which are addictive.

One of the tenets of "Kenyan Socialism" is that the U.S. is a schmoozocracy. The ruling elite would have you believe it's a meritocracy but it's not.

I See No Way to Read This from Greg Mankiw Other than as the Strongest Possible Endorsement of Obama and the Democrats by DeLong

Janet Yellen: yes we are failing.

Maddening Monetary Policy Making by Tim Duy

Charlie Rose had a show on the anniversary of Hitchens's birthday yesterday which included Salman Rushdie, James Fenton, Ian McEwan and Martin Amis.

They captured how generous and democratic he was socially with impeccable manners and had one of the best senses of humor around. He was also very tough and "honorable." Rushdie who is very funny, describes himself crying he was laughing so hard with Hitchens one night and McEwan said he'd get stomach cramps from all the laughter. Amis had some great anecdotes also. And Fenton was right to describe him as the spirit of '68.

Rushdie's memoir will drop Sept. 17. It's called Joseph Anton after the name he took when in hiding from Iran's supreme leader's fatwa. He derived it from the first names of two of his favorite authors, Conrad and Chekov.

HBO picked up Game of Thrones for a third season.

Some Reflections on the Crisis and the Policy Response by Ben Bernanke

(via DeLong)

Dean Baker reduces uncertainty

Inflation: The Secret Answer to the Eurozone Crisis by Baker

Some people argue that Ned Stark had too much honor or was a fool. But Janos Slynt, (former) commander of the city watch, found out that having no honor doesn't benefit you either. Tyrion doesn't trust him and sent him to the Wall. Being too wised-up or cynical can make you a fool as well.

The Night Lands
(or a Song of Ice and Fire
or on HBO Sunday night is Onion knight)

Religion, theology and the supernatural figured prominently in the second show of the second sesason of Game of Thones. Rakharo could or could not enter the Dothraki afterlife. The Greyjoys uttered their religious callout-saying*: "What's Dead May Never Die" to their Drowned God. The small council pondered how do you kill a dead man. With fire apparently, replied Tyrion. He said he believes Mormont whom he met on his trip to the Wall, while Maester Pycelle said the notherners have always been superstitious. Davos Seaworth told his "True Believer" son Matthos that prayer doesn't work, but no reflection on how Melisandre the Red Priestess survived drinking the poison last episode? Melisandre tells Stannis he must give all of him to the Lord of Light in exchange for victory while Jon Snow stumbled upon the arrangement Craster has with The Others.

One thing mind-blowing about the first season what how the premiere episode had The Others arranging wildling body parts in a gnostic circle for the luckless Nightswatch ranger to find.** And then the season finale had a shot of Khal Drogo's funeral pyre which formed a gnostic circle also. And the dragon eggs hatched.

-----------------------------------
*I can't find what this is called and it's making me feel stupid (although maybe there isn't a specific word for it). It's a religious phrase automatically said in response to some other religious word or phrase, usually in unison by everyone present. I now it's done in Islam and Catholicism. In this episode, the Greyjoys are saying in response to the naming of a deceased relative.
**And then The Others quickly took the wildling body parts back (to eat?).

Because the stakes are so small by Steve Randy Waldman

Black Sabbath rumored to headline Lollapalooza along with the Red Hot Chili Peppers and Black Keys.

The Cash Nexus (or - almost - everyone has a price) 


The Sellsword Bronn tells Tryion he'd kill babies for a price. Tyrion had told Slynt he had no honor something Bronn admits to. I think back to Ned telling Varys that his life wasn't so precious to him that he would dishonor it. And for Littlefinger, it's accumulate, accumulate, accumulate.

Game of Thrones Week 2: Who Watches the Watchers? by Charlie Jane Anders

"The Night Lands" (for experts) Onion recap

Many comments.

"The Night Lands" (for newbies) Onion recap

Good comments too!

Happy Zombie Jesus Day!

Welfare Limits Left Poor Adrift as Recession Hit

David Simon is tired of your love for The Wire

In a typically contentious New York Times interview, the guy who would probably appreciate it if we didn’t refer to him as “Wire creator” waxed crotchety over his exhaustion with all the too-late love for the show, which could have used that sort of attention when it was still on the air. Because, like the scrappy punk band that only sold a handful of records in its heyday, but now everyone is so into it, you just weren’t there, man: 

Damsels in Distress Onion review

My pick for the three dragonriders who will conquer Westeros are Old Nan, Hodor and Patchface.

The Red Priestess

The night is dark and full of terrors,
but the fire burns them all away

Camila Vallejo, the World’s Most Glamorous Revolutionary

 
Spain Jolts Euro Zone Back on Alert

"Embarrass the Future"? by Linda Greenhouse

The chief justice’s concurring opinion in the strip search case, only three paragraphs long, is interesting for a reason beyond what it might suggest about intramural stress. Here is the final paragraph:

“The court makes a persuasive case for the general applicability of the rule it announces. The court is nonetheless wise to leave open the possibility of exceptions, to ensure that we not ‘embarrass the future.’ ”

“Embarrass the future”? The quote, from a 1944 opinion by Justice Felix Frankfurter in a tax case, is usually offered to mean that the court shouldn’t encumber itself by declaring solutions to problems that have yet to emerge. Maybe that’s all the chief justice meant. But John Roberts is both a careful prose stylist and a man acutely conscious of his and the court’s place in history. There are so many other ways of expressing a minimalist impulse than this unconventional use of the word “embarrass” that I have to wonder whether he didn’t have in mind the prospect of institutional embarrassment, and not only in the case at hand.

Feldstein v. Lazear on the Size of the Output Gap by EconoSpeak (ProGrowthLiberal)

Lazear wants us to believe that the economy could have continued to grow by 3.4% per year since 2007QIV even though average growth was less than 2.5% for the 2001 to 2007 period. If that claim had any credence then potential real GDP would have been almost $15.3 trillion as of 2011QIV as opposed to actual real GDP being only $13.4 trillion. In other words, Lazear wants us to believe that the current GDP gap is 12%. Not that anyone should believe such nonsense but isn’t it interesting that Dr. Feldstein is worried that we may be overestimating the GDP gap.

Republicans are simultaneously pushing two themes. One theme is that current Federal Reserve policy is endangering an inflationary spiral, which seems to be the concern of Dr. Feldstein. The other theme is that the Obama Administration is somehow making the recession worse, which Dr. Lazear was so happy to echo. Funny thing – these two themes appear to be contradictory.

(via Thoma)

Cold Winds Are Rising.

Briefly, three things struck me about last night's Game of Thrones season 2 opener. I liked how they used the red comet in the sky to shift scenes from Bran at Winterfell to Daenerys in the Red Wastes of Esteros to Jon Snow north of the Wall to Stannis Baratheon on Dragonstone. There was also the symmetry of the new kings standing up to their respective strong-willed mothers: Robb to Catelyn and Joffrey to Cersei. (Turns out they should heed their mothers' advice.)

Also during the small council meeting, Maester Pycelle displayed the white raven from the Citadel in Oldtown which means the maesters had determined the long summer was over and Winter is Coming. Littlefinger noted they had enough wheat for 5 years but if the winter lasted longer, well they'd have fewer peasants, of course.

For some reason this reminded me of macroeconomic policy discussion. In the United States, the Business Cycle Dating Committee of the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) is generally seen as the authority for dating US recessions just as the conclave of maesters date the seasons in Westeros. And it reminded me of the way elite policymakers take an "objective" view of the fates of the "small people." Fewer peasants if they didn't store enough wheat? No biggie. Transforming cyclical unemployment into long-term unemployment and degrading the nation's productive capacity with a prolonged output gap? Oh well, won't really effect our social circle, just the common people, who as Jorah Mormont said "don't care about the games the high lords play" and only "pray for rain, health and a summer that never ends."

Charlie Jane Anders recap of season 2 episode 1 "The North Remembers"

(A couple of side notes: first, when Cersei makes a fuss over Littlefinger's mockingbird pin, was I the only one who went, "OMG, Littlefinger's in league with Katniss"? And second, the only pornotastic moment in the episode, in Littlefinger's brothel, involves newbie sex workers getting schooled in the art of fakery, underscoring that for Littlefinger, both knowledge and falsehood are power.)*

George R.R. Martin’s A Song Of Ice And Fire by Genevieve Koski and Tasha Robinson

The North Remembers (for experts) - the Onion recap

(good comment section. Spoilers by the barrel-full.)

The North Remembers (for newbies) - the Onion recap

What I find myself drawn to in the books and show are the characters who have a sense of honor and goodness.** Tyrion, Ser Jorah Mormont, Ser Barristan Selmy, Davos Seaworth and Brienne Tarth. I find it compelling even if some of them might in some people's minds have too much honor (like Ned Stark and Stannis). It makes a nice contrast in a world of such cruelty. As Robert Baratheon tells Cersei, "that's all the realm is now: backstabbing and scheming and ass-licking and money-grubbing." And then with Joffrey the people get another evil, capricious dictator not unlike the "Mad King" Aerys Targaryen who the Houses Stark, Baratheon, and Arryn rebelled against (with the Lannisters coming in at the very end).
___________________
* The Hunger Games soundtrack is doing well with two bands Krugman has promoted at his blog: The Civil Wars and Arcade Fire (although Arcade Fire were already huge.) There's also Neko Case who I love and Taylor Swift who I like but feel somehow I shouldn't like. She's too pop? Too young?

** I'm also drawn to the characters who are sort of cheeky, brave, fearless-in-a-way and smart-asses like Tyrion (who isn't afraid of his sister and talks back to his father) and Oberyn Martell who fights the Mountain - Jaime to an extent but for him its almost to a fault - and Renly Baratheon in the book. In the show to me he's painted as being more resentful of his brother Robert. In the book he comes off as more devil-may care (which turns out badly for him) although I like the actor who plays him in the show.

Game of Thrones Season 2 is this Sunday. Here is a half hour special were the makers discuss some interesting things:

Full-Length Special: You Win or You Die

Three things struck me. One is how they emphasize the feminist nature of the strong female characters, maybe because fantasy fans are typically male. Secondly, how one of the creators said he wanted it to be like past HBO shows the Sopranos and Deadwood with many characters (but no mention of the Wire.) And thirdly, one of the creators mentioned how the show entered into discussion of contemporary politics. My guess is he was referring to the way Obama was played by Republicans over, say, the debt ceiling and how Ned Stark was played by Cersei and Littlefinger. Lefty/liberal critics of Obama say he was naive to believe his opponents would negotiate in good faith. Maybe so but part of the reason Obama was elected was his appeal to patriotic, post-partisanship (neither red states nor blue states but one America, etc.) Just as Ned Stark was loved and respected as a leader, friend, husband, brother and father for his appeal to a code of honor and loyalty.

Alan Beattie, Archon of the Shrill: Selections from His "Who’s in Charge Here?" by DeLong

Book extract: Who’s in Charge Here?: The problem is not the international monetary or economic system as such. It is that economic policy was run badly within that system…. Financial regulators and central banks were far too nonchalant about the huge amount of borrowing that was going on, and the ever more exotic financial assets that were being created to facilitate it. Governments in economies such as the UK and USA watched huge housing booms take off, financed by those incomprehensible financial instruments, and cheered them on their way…. But there was nothing inevitable about making these mistakes. Nothing in the global economic system forced the USA to run a hopelessly dispersed regulatory system that allowed financial institutions to escape proper scrutiny…. No one compelled a gang of countries in Continental Europe to yoke their disparate economies together in a badly designed currency union that encouraged asset bubbles in the periphery fueled by reckless lending by banks in the centre.

Some argue that the crisis was inevitable because the big emerging markets, particularly China, by persisting in intervening in the foreign exchange markets to hold down their own currencies, were in effect shovelling huge amounts of money at the rich world…. But the mistakes of countries on the receiving end were avoidable without changing the system – indeed, some countries have largely avoided them. Countries where governments exercised proper control over their banks, such as Canada and Australia, have been much more stable. Not a single major Canadian financial institution failed during the crisis….

The current predicament of the world economy is all the more poignant because it is unnecessary. This is a political and ideological crisis, not a technocratic one. Authorities could have done, and could still do, a lot to prevent their economies sliding back into recession and financial chaos. That they are not doing so is not just because of a lack of political will. It is also because significant numbers of voters and politicians have learnt precisely the wrong lessons from previous episodes and are determined to make similar mistakes all over again.

 
Ben Bernanke's Eeyore Strategy by Yglesias

Charles Evans and friends on the Odyssean strategy

Circumstances will tempt the FOMC to renege on these promises precisely because the policy rule describes its preferred behavior. Hence this kind of forward guidance resembles Odysseus commanding his sailors to tie him to the ship's mast so that he can enjoy the Sirens' music.

And a little meta-humor in the first footnote! Very David Foster Wallacian.

Bloggers in St. Louis by Mark Thoma

Krugman Nails It! Problem Is Crony Capitalism, Not Free Market Fundamentalism by Dean Baker

Bernanke gave a talk to the National Association for Business Economists.

In addition to the heavy toll on workers and families, he noted that “Because of its negative effects on workers’ skills and attachment to the labor force, long-term unemployment may ultimately reduce the productive capacity of our economy.”
...

Mr. Bernanke said Monday that structural unemployment may have increased in recent years, but that high unemployment was mostly cyclical.

“The continued weakness in aggregate demand is likely the predominant factor,” he said. “Consequently, the Federal Reserve’s accommodative monetary policies, by providing support for demand and for the recovery, should help, over time, to reduce long-term unemployment as well.”

Mr. Bernanke outlined several reasons for this conclusion. He said that people who lost work recently had not increased their advantage in finding new jobs over the long-term unemployed, as might be expected if the latter group were languishing because they lacked relevant skills. And he noted that hiring generally remained weak across the economy, again suggesting that the lack of new hiring had broad causes rather than industry-specific roots.

Lessons from the Great Canadian Slump by Krugman

A prolonged Output Gap does not necessarily entail deflation or falling inflation/disinflation.

A Bailout by Another Name by Gretchen Morgenson

Morgenson discusses Peter DeMarco and principle writedowns and differs from people I usually agree with. She feels to take up a number of issues like aren't taxpayers served by an economy growing at potential with no output gap? It is giving money to banks but it is also helping people deleverage by getting out from under underwater mortgages. Perhaps there would be some way for the banks to help pay, but I doubt the Republicans who control the House would go for it.

The Age of the Shadow Bank Run by Tyler Cowen

Cowen notes the success of the post-World Years II with FDIC preventing bank runs but suggest doing something similar today would create morale hazard. Basically he's anti-regulation. Weird aporia of a liberatarian.

Macroeconomic Chutzpah by Krugman

Spain Is Not Out of the Woods Yet

Tested By A Picturesque Dystopia by Manohla Dargis

Confessed 4 Life

Bridget Regan replies to Seeker costar Craig Horner: "Sad I can't be there with you!"

Horner: "Seeker Fans, I will be visiting WonderCon in Anaheim California March 17th and 18th from 12pm till 3:30pm..."

Bernanke Denies Fed Rate Policy Caused Housing Bubble

Most evidence suggests the Federal Reserve‘s policy of low interest rates in the early 2000s didn’t cause the recent housing bubble, Chairman Ben Bernanke said Thursday in slides prepared for a college lecture.

While some have argued the Fed’s low interest rates in the early 2000s contributed to the U.S. housing collapse, international examples and the timing of the bubble show otherwise, Bernanke said Thursday in slides for the second of his four lectures at George Washington University this month.

For example, house prices rose sharply in the United Kingdom in the same time period, even though the U.K. had tighter monetary policy than the U.S., Bernanke wrote. He also noted housing prices began to pick up in the late 1990s before the Fed began cutting interest rates and rose sharply after the central bank began tightening.

Finally, Own-to-Rent by Jared Bernstein

Bernanke lecture video 2 of 4

Bernanke lecture video 1 of 4

review of Noam Scheiber's "The Escape Artists" by John Cassidy

(via Thoma)

How can debt effect GDP? by Noah Smith

(via Thoma)

Why Democrats Have a Problem With Young Voters by Rich Perlstein

My politics of optimism and hope still casts its lot with the Democrats — in the optimistic hope that the dying embers of its status as the party of our better angels, one that took risks for social justice, can still be fanned into a flame. But I'm an old man, born in 1969. I can't really blame someone born in 1991 for not buying the idea that the Democrats were once a party that often took political risks for social justice and can be again. Why should they believe me? They've never seen it in their lifetimes.

What's This "We" Jazz, White Man? Robert Samuelson Edition by Dean Baker

"Four years after the onset of the financial crisis — in March 2008 Bear Stearns was rescued from failure — we still lack a clear understanding of the underlying causes."

Wow, it sure doesn't seem very hard to me. The Reagan-Volcker policies of the early 80s broke the link between productivity growth and wage growth for ordinary workers. This meant that demand growth did not necessarily keep pace with output potential as had been true earlier in the post-war period, since higher wages would quickly translate into higher consumption. 

That created an environment which opened a door to speculative bubbles. In the 90s it was the stock bubble which drove growth, primarily by pushing saving rates to then record lows. In the last decade it was the housing bubble which drove growth, both by creating a building boom and also by pushing saving rates even lower as bubble generated home equity led to a consumption boom.
None of this story is new. I was writing about how the stock bubble was driving the economy in the 90s and how the housing bubble was driving the economy as early as 2002. And, I gave the historical picture in Plunder and Blunder: The Rise and Fall of the Bubble Economy.

But, folks like Robert Samuelson would rather pretend that the whole story is a great mystery rather than contemplate the possibility that the economic instability of the last decade had its roots in a pattern of growth that was built on redistributing income from ordinary workers to the most highly paid workers and corporate profits.

Kenyan Socialism endorses this narrative with some additions.

Robert Samuelson endorses the fatalistic, old-timey Mellon view of busts that the rottenness of economy needs to be purged.

Samuelson links to this review of 21 books on the crisis and this review of 16 scholarly papers (by Gary Gorton).

Bernanke endorsed Gorton's work on the rise of the shadow banking system.

The Baffler is back again.

Too Smart To Fail: Notes on an Age of Folly by Thomas Frank