Showing posts with label media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label media. Show all posts

Monday, January 27, 2014

Project X (working title)

Project X (working title) with Ezra Klein, Matt Yglesias, Dylan Matthews and Melissa Bell.

David Leonhardt tweets about "Vox is our next"

Ezra Klein Is Joining Vox Media as Web Journalism Asserts Itself by David Carr


Sunday, September 26, 2010

Arsenal of Democracy

Dean Baker points us to an editorial at the Washington Post.
Nor is Mr. Obama or his economic policy to blame for the economy's inability so far to resume robust, job-generating growth. The economy faces a painful, protracted process of deleveraging. Households and companies must work off a huge overhang of debt built up during the boom, and they can't resume spending and investing in the meantime. That deleveraging will hamper growth for -- well, for as long as it takes. Government efforts may ease deleveraging, but to the extent they succeed, it is generally by postponing the day of reckoning and making it more expensive when it inevitably arrives. 
Baker also notes that those calling for sacrifice failed to foresee the $8 trillion housing bubble which caused the overleveraging of debt. As Krugman argues, we can work off the debt cleanly or ugly. In the meantime the government could boost aggregate demand to utilize excess capacity until the private sector recovers. 

Here Krugman blogs about a new paper which shows that fiscal stimulus worked during the prewar buildup to World War II.
What Gordon and Krenn point out is that we actually have more information than a simple comparison between the depressed peacetime economy and the war economy after Pearl Harbor: there was a period of more than two years when the United States was gearing up for war but not yet engaged in combat -- the Arsenal of Democracy era. Rationing was not yet in effect, and for at least part of this period the economy still had excess capacity despite a very large rise in government spending.
...in the prewar buildup you had a clear-cut expansion of federal spending on the order of 14 percent of GDP. That’s a real experiment with the economy. And the results were clearly Keynesian.
The editors at the Post seems to the think the stimulus bill worked to help prevent another Great Depression - actually it was negated by the "50 little Hoovers" at the state level - but they don't advocate more to get us to full employment and full capacity usage.

It seems to the editors at the Post were a little too complacent about the housing bubble and are currently too complacent about high unemployment, slow growth and disinflation.

Interesting bit from a commenter at Baker's blog:
From Keynes's The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money: Chapter 21 - Trade Cycle - Section III:

"Furthermore, even if we were to suppose that contemporary booms are apt to be associated with a momentary condition of full investment or over-investment in the strict sense, it would still be absurd to regard a higher rate of interest as the appropriate remedy. For in this event the case of those who attribute the disease to under-consumption would be wholly established. The remedy would lie in various measures designed to increase the propensity to consume by the redistribution of incomes or otherwise; so that a given level of employment would require a smaller volume of current investment to support it."

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

The Microcosm of the Macro

Obama gave an impressive performance again trying to redirect the conversation - not all Wall Streeters are criminals or immoral - and answering the media's question during a live press conference tonight. I thought it was interesting that he called on Univision, Starts and Stripes and Ebony, outlets not normally called upon. The Fox guy's question was couched in typically misconstrued terms. He tried to be ironic about "Communist" China questioning the dollar as reserve currency and "Socialist" Europe's pushback on a spending stimulus, but it just reflected the typical Fox viewer's cramped view of the situation. He also gave a firm but respectful answer to the Washington Times' questioner about embryonic stem cell research.