John F. Burns on Afghanistan:

In the summer of 2010, Kandahar, again, is at the heart of the matter. Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the American commander, has been signaling for months that the crucial engagement of the war, aimed at loosing the tentacles the Taliban have wound around the city and its outlying districts, would begin sometime this spring or summer. True to the form he set since taking command in Kabul last year, when he warned that the war was on its way to being lost unless radical new strategies were adopted, the general has left no room for illusion. In effect, he has said, the struggle for Kandahar may determine the outcome of the war.

U.S. troop reductions are to begin in July 2011.

A report prepared by the London School of Economics says Pakistani intelligence still exerts a great sway on Afghan Taliban almost nine years after 9/11.

Drawing on interviews with Afghan Taliban commanders and former Taliban ministers and officials, the report suggests that Pakistan’s premier intelligence service, the Inter-Services Intelligence agency, or ISI, supports the Taliban insurgency as a matter of official policy to contain the influence in Afghanistan of its rival India. Both serving and retired officials from the Pakistani intelligence agency are carrying out that policy, the report says.

Although many of the specifics of the report could not be independently verified, the bulk of its conclusions are very much in line with what Afghan officials, and some Western officials, have often alleged: that Pakistan has maintained its longstanding relationship with the Afghan Taliban to retain its influence in Afghanistan.

In other words, the Pakistanis are waiting for us to leave to continue their contest against their neighbor India in Afghanistan. So, nuclear Pakistan and nuclear India are fighting it out in Afghanistan and in Kashmir. India has a widespread Maoist insurgency. India is unable and/or unwilling to improve its infrastructure and leads the world in road fatalities.

India overtook China to top the world in road fatalities in 2006 and has continued to pull steadily ahead, despite a heavily agrarian population, fewer people than China and far fewer cars than many Western countries.

While road deaths in many other big emerging markets have declined or stabilized in recent years, even as vehicle sales jumped, in India, fatalities are skyrocketing -- up 40 percent in five years to more than 118,000 in 2008, the last figure available.

Video of India's Highway of Death. "Every day in India, 320 people are killed in traffic accidents, the highest rate in the world. What will happen as new roads are built and thousands of drivers are taking the wheel?"

Why should an international investor invest in India? Why should an international businessperson do business with India? Their cheap labor costs? I have a feeling those doing business with India will come to be sorry.