Did the Last Quarter Finally Bring Growth Back? by Yglesias
The Bureau of Economic Analysis released its latest revision to third
quarter gross domestic product numbers and the news is ... really good.
It says that the economy's nominal output rose 6.2 percent in the third
quarter and that 4.8 of those percentage points were real output.
If true, this is three kinds of good news. The first is that nominal output growth of above
5 percent is the kind of "catch-up" demand that the country needs after
a prolonged funk. The second kind of good news is that in the context
of that kind of rapid nominal growth, the low inflation number (and
therefore the high real growth number) is great news that the economy
still has lots of running room. Our workers and our capital goods
haven't become useless, there simply hasn't been enough demand for their
output. The third piece of good news is that while the previous
revision to this figure was basically just a big bump in inventories,
today's revision was about final demand so it means the growth is
sustainable.
The bad news is ... I'm not entirely persuaded this data is correct.
Real gross domestic income, which longtime national accounting fans will
recall is an alternative way of estimating the same quantity that RGDP
is supposed to measure, rose by a fairly anemic 1.8 percent.
Given enough time, GDP and GDI estimates usually converge ,which is
good because GDP=GDI by definition. And in recent years the convergence
has usually taken the form of meeting closer to the GDI number than to
the GDP number. So this could all be a kind of statistical mirage. I'd
say Barack Obama's sagging poll numbers are also an indication that the
more pessimistic GDI estimate may be the more accurate one. The
conventional wisdom says it's all about the healthcare.gov mishaps, but
we all remember from Bill Clinton's second term that robust economic
growth leads to a lot of forgiveness. I tend to think that if the
economy were really accelerating, we'd see indication of that in a
brighter public mood.
Well 7 percent unemployment is much worse than 4 percent.
No comments:
Post a Comment